John Eonas
A guide to the work

Follow the question.
Revise the answer.

The research begins with spacetime and moves outward: into mathematical representation, gravitational behavior, quantum correlations, and the interpretation of time.

The latest manuscripts also record changes in direction. Earlier proposals are narrowed, corrected, or withdrawn when their assumptions do not support the original claim.

Explore the full collection ↗
Geometric artwork illustrating intersecting curves and surfaces
Conceptual artwork from the original John Eonas website.
A reading path

From foundations to limits.

01

Begin with spacetime.

Physical Field vs. Geometric Manifold ↗

Start with two descriptions of spacetime. The paper treats their agreement in tested regimes separately from the author’s working ontological preference.

02

Examine the geometry.

The Collapse of the Hypotenuse ↗

Then explore how geometric setting changes endpoint separation. Read alongside the Zeno Continuum for a different question: what a chosen mathematical representation retains.

03

Ask what can be tested.

Surface-Bound Maximum ↗

Distinguish an alternative interior clock hypothesis from known exterior behavior. In the acceleration papers, distinguish a transient mechanism from a quantified prediction.

04

Look at the boundaries.

The Causal Bottleneck ↗

Finish with causality and the requirements for a controllable signal. QEL’s current edition withdraws its transport interpretation and retains a correlation and sensing programme.

The current research picture

Ideas with
their conditions attached.

A mathematical construction, a physical interpretation, and a demonstrated effect are different kinds of result. Each paper page identifies its current status and the conditions still left open.

Mathematical constructions

The geometric and infinitesimal papers define particular settings. They do not replace ordinary arithmetic or the standard real identity 0.999… = 1.

Physical proposals

Interior clock behavior, artificial geometric coupling, and sensing protocols remain proposals with stated assumptions and unresolved steps.

Interpretive questions

The block-universe and spacetime-ontology papers compare explanations. Their preferences are not presented as experimentally established distinctions.

Open to dialogue

Good questions belong
in conversation.

For research discussion, correspondence, and collaboration.